People are eager to return to grocery stores, but Amazon seems to be missing the opportunity.
This article is part of the On Tech newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it weekdays.
Amazon has been so successful in the last year that words almost fail me. Except in one area.
Sales at Amazon’s stores, mostly from its Whole Foods grocery chain, fell by 15 percent in the first three months of this year compared with the same period in 2020. Those sales have now been declining for a year.
The numbers from Amazon have gaping holes that make it hard to know exactly what’s happening. But we can tell that something isn’t quite working.
Nearly four years after Amazon agreed to a huge deal to buy Whole Foods and a year into a pandemic that played into the tech giant’s strengths, it’s worth asking two questions: Is Amazon losing in groceries? And why has one of the world’s most ambitious and inventive companies mostly been a follower rather than a leader in one of the biggest spending categories for Americans?
What Amazon does in groceries matters to all Americans, even if we never buy milk and bananas from the company. Consumers and Amazon’s competitors consider it to be at the cutting edge of innovation. But that’s not the case in groceries — at least not yet.
Let me backtrack to those falling sales numbers from Amazon’s physical stores. The problem is that those numbers don’t include the grocery orders that people place online and then pick up at stores or have delivered. Those sales have mushroomed during the pandemic for Amazon and its competitors.
An Amazon spokesman told me that adding up all of the ways that people are grocery shopping from Whole Foods, including online ordering for pickup or deliveries, shows that the company’s sales have been increasing. Amazon doesn’t give specifics, however, which is often a sign that the numbers aren’t amazing. If Amazon is selling many more groceries than it did before the pandemic — as is the case with Walmart and Target — the company is being uncharacteristically quiet about it.
This makes me wonder whether Walmart’s grocery sales, which increased by 9 percent in the year that ended on Jan. 31, are growing faster than Amazon’s. That shouldn’t be happening, given both Walmart’s mammoth lead over Amazon in grocery sales.
I’m also going to say something that might sound wacky after a year of manic shopping by clicks: Real life grocery stores still matter. A lot. And that’s not a great sign for Amazon.
Sucharita Kodali, who studies shopping and consumer behavior for the research firm Forrester, recently dug into our pandemic-altered habits and found that many people were eager to roam the grocery aisles again.
Yes, many people tried grocery delivery or curbside pickups at stores for the first time during the pandemic, and some of those habits will stick. But, Kodali wrote in a recent report, “The vast majority of grocery sales in the U.S. happen and will continue to happen in stores.”
Stores are familiar to navigate, and some people are nostalgic for their old habits, Kodali told me. And many people, according to Forrester’s analysis, have been discouraged by botched orders, high prices or other problems with online grocery shopping.
Many companies, including Amazon, Target and Walmart, also pluck many items for online grocery orders from the regular store shelves. Grocery sellers need their stores for both in-person shopping and the virtual kind.
Let’s see what happens to Amazon in the coming months. Those in-store sales could bounce back as city dwellers near Whole Foods stores come back and as office workers grab prepared meals again.
But no matter what, Amazon’s blah Whole Foods sales are worth paying attention to. They’re another sign that something is amiss in what has been 15 years of Amazon’s mostly disjointed and unsuccessful strategy in groceries.
Walmart, the regional chain Kroger, and start-ups like Instacart and Uber are trying clever ideas to shake up the grocery industry. Besides its still-unproven technology to skip the cashier lines at stores, Amazon’s big move in groceries seems to be opening a new chain in addition to Whole Foods.
I remain interested in what Amazon does in groceries. But for now, maybe we should pay less attention to Amazon in this area until it shows that whatever it’s doing is working.
Before we go …
-
Mr. Beast Inc.: Jimmy Donaldson, the YouTube star known as Mr. Beast, is trying to build a business empire that includes investments in other online personalities and lending his name to a burger chain. My colleague Taylor Lorenz wrote about the behind-the-scenes strife in Mr. Beast’s inner circle and whether people with big online followings can also build sustainable businesses.
-
Self-help and chaos in India: Indians using social media to find hospital beds and medical supplies during the country’s coronavirus surge have a problem: They are overwhelmed by a deluge of unverified information, and some of them want social media companies to help, Bloomberg News reported. Rest of World also wrote about online self-help groups in India that have been questioned or shut down by the police.
-
Lumberjack TikTok? There is a bubble. In lumber. For real. And that has inspired lumber-related memes and turned a Canadian logger into a lumberjack TikTok star, Vox wrote.
Hugs to this
Here is Becky the hedgehog getting a bath and LOVING IT. (I think.)
We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you’d like us to explore. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.
If you don’t already get this newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.
"still" - Google News
May 04, 2021 at 11:27PM
https://ift.tt/3nU3l4o
Stores Still Matter. Where’s Amazon? - The New York Times
"still" - Google News
https://ift.tt/35pEmfO
https://ift.tt/2YsogAP
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Stores Still Matter. Where’s Amazon? - The New York Times"
Post a Comment